Belfast·SPG004 Residential Extensions and Alterations·Page 46·4.3.38

Acceptability of Fencing Types and Heights

Close-board fencing in public areas is visually unacceptable. Timber fence panels over 1m at the front are unlikely to be acceptable unless historically characteristic of the area. Tall fencing at rear gardens may be acceptable for privacy but can impact sight lines and traffic safety on driveways or corner sites.

Expanses of close-board fencing in public areas are visually unacceptable as they can appear hostile and deteriorate more rapidly than other forms of boundary treatment. Timber fence panels that are more than 1m in height are unlikely to be acceptable at the front of properties, unless it can be demonstrated that this type of boundary historically formed an aspect of the character of the area. Tall fencing is more likely to be acceptable around rear gardens when a sense of privacy and enhanced security can result, but when erected beside driveways or on corner sights they can have an impact on sight lines and traffic safety. The visual and road safety aspects of a wall or fence will therefore be assessed when proposals are being considered.

Source — /Users/richardhill/Documents/planning-arch-project/data/documents/belfast/SPG004 Residential Extensions and Alterations.pdf