Technical Booklet R Access to and Use of Buildings·Page 15·1.10
Access statements and alternative design solutions
Access statements are optional but can be used to justify alternative design approaches to Part R requirements. Applicants may demonstrate compliance through evidence such as BS 8300 recommendations, research, consultations, or convincing arguments that an alternative achieves equivalent or better outcomes.
Access statements are not a requirement of the Building Regulations. Applicants may wish to satisfy the requirements of Part R by adopting the guidance and provisions of Technical Booklet R. However, they could choose to follow the performance criteria given in paragraph 0.1 and offer alternative design solutions they believe comply with the reasonable provision requirements of the relevant regulation. Evidence to support such an alternative design approach might include –
(a) application of the recommendations in BS 8300 where these differ from the provisions, or are not covered, in this Technical Booklet;
(b) results of current validated research;
(c) outcome of consultations with other parties (e.g. Northern Ireland Environment Agency, Access Officers, local Access Groups, etc.); and
(d) convincing arguments that an alternative solution will achieve the same, a better, or a more convenient outcome.
An access statement setting out the rationale for the access strategy, could be useful in presenting the evidence of the design approach adopted.
Source — /Users/richardhill/Documents/planning-arch-project/data/documents/regional/Technical Booklet R - Access to and Use of Buildings.pdf