SPPS Strategic Planning Policy Statement Edition 2 (December 2025)·Page 8·1.10
Resolving Conflicts Between SPPS and Retained Policy
Where the SPPS conflicts with retained policy, the SPPS takes precedence. However, where the SPPS is silent or less prescriptive, retained policy should not be given lesser weight.
Any conflict between the SPPS and any policy retained under the transitional arrangements must be resolved in the favour of the provisions of the SPPS. For example, where the SPPS introduces a change of policy direction and/or provides a policy clarification that would be in conflict with the retained policy the SPPS should be accorded greater weight in the assessment of individual planning applications. However, where the SPPS is silent or less prescriptive on a particular planning policy matter than retained policies this should not be judged to lessen the weight to be afforded to the retained policy.
Source — /Users/richardhill/Documents/planning-arch-project/data/documents/regional/SPPS - Strategic Planning Policy Statement Edition 2 (December 2025).pdf